Automated software tests are usually a lot less expensive to execute, require less time to run, and permit less human error than manual testing. That is the reason most software organizations at last build an automated test suite.
There are numerous important points while getting started with your automated testing process, however apparently the most significant is picking the right tools. Picking the right tools can figure out who will write and keep up with the tests and hence how rapidly and effectively you can scale up your testing process.
An accurate, no-code test automation tool empowers anybody in the item team to rapidly create and edit tests so you will not need to recruit additional workforce for testing. Our specialized tools are specially designed to allow anybody to create automated tests without learning a programming language.
In this informative tutorial, we’ll give a couple of resources to assist you to build structure and direction for your testing endeavors. Then, we will provide a step by step look at how to begin automation testing without any preparation utilizing QA fiction tools.
Understanding Where to Begin and What Tests to Automate
While automation can assist you with doing testing quicker than expected and catch more bugs, you need to determine whether your application is prepared for automation prior to building any automated tests.
Whether or not your application is prepared for automation relies upon the stability of your product. Assuming your product is still in the early advancement stage and major code changes are occurring consistently, it’s not the best time to automate yet — hold on until the application under test is more steady and stable.
On the other hand if you have a bunch of user paths that do not usually change often however get tested frequently, for instance smoke tests or regression tests. All things considered, automation would be a solid fit.
In general, the more automated versus manual tests you have, ultimately the more time and money you’ll save — however you can begin seeing an impact with only five or ten automated tests. However, some test cases are generally a superior fit for manual testing, including user paths that:
There are more variety of testing that innately require human testers:
Whenever you have carefully determined that your application is prepared for automation testing, building a useful test automation strategy will assist you with meeting your objectives quicker and utilize your resources all the more proficiently.
One of the initial steps is characterizing your scope of automation – that is specifically which test cases you’ll be automating.
Determining Which Test Cases to Automate
Many automation teams think that more testing generally leads to better quality, which is comprehensible because more testing can mean less bugs get transported to production. Nonetheless, more testing isn’t the objective. If you’re not testing the right things, more testing simply implies more work — particularly with regards to automation testing.
One of the biggest startling expenses for QA teams is test maintenance (i.e., the continuous task of updating tests to reflect changes and new highlights in your product). Each automated test unavoidably should be carefully maintained. That is the reason any test that isn’t crucial for further improving test coverage will probably wind up costing more to keep up with than it’s actual worth.
To focus on our testing, we like to utilize the analogy of a snowplow. Imagine your application resembles a city — all the user paths through the application resemble the expressways, roads, and side streets of a city. At the point when it snows, the snowplow team follows a predefined route through the city to clear the most trafficked roads first since they affect too many people. Then, if the team has the available time and resources, side streets with little traffic might get plowed. Similarly, you should begin by building tests along the most critical, trafficked user paths of your application.
Moreover, you can focus on which sorts of testing you will begin with. This makes building an automated testing suite more reasonable while additionally ensuring you benefit from the tests you do have. The two kinds of testing you ought to focus on when you’re simply beginning are smoke testing and regression testing.
Smoke testing covers the most fundamental user paths to ensure the application is stable and steady to continue on toward further testing procedure. This is a good spot to begin because the sooner you notice a defective build in the development process, the simpler it’ll be to fix it.
Regression testing is normally the last step of the testing procedure before deployment. It covers every one of the important functionalities of an application and ensures the new form doesn’t introduce any bugs. Automating your regression suite is particularly significant for teams following agile software development practices, as we talk about in this article on agile regression testing.
While starting the automation process with even a couple of smoke or regression tests can save you a lot of time and money.
Picking the Right Test Automation Tool
At last, the software testing tool you pick plays a crucial part in how effectively and rapidly you can scale up your testing. We suggest looking for a automated testing tool that:
QA experts and even beginners can assist you with QA so you can easily and quickly build a set-up of tests without adding any headcount.
Is generally an all in one arrangement so that you can deal with all parts of testing from one platform itself.
It doesn’t lock you into an contract or have any hidden charges so you can scale up or down as your requirements request without paying for an excess need.
You ought to likewise look for a tool with a possibility for running a few tests free of cost so you can give it a shot with practically no risk.
A True No-code Test Automation Framework
QA Fiction’s no-code test automation platform allows anybody to write and keep up with tests. QA Fiction’s automated tests connect with software by means of the UI, mimicking the genuine user experience. This enjoys a few upper hands over the technique utilized by tools like Selenium WebDriver or Appium (which is essentially Selenium but for iOS and Android applications).
Unlike those tools, which identify the components on the page by finding locator IDs in the basic code, QA Fiction involves pixel-matching to distinguish and communicate with components in the UI. This implies that QA Fiction tests really check both the usefulness of the application and the appearance simultaneously. It additionally implies our tests are less inclined to break when there are minor code changes that don’t influence the UI.
Let’s see how it works
Contrary to automated testing tools like Selenium and other open-source tools, QA companies allow you to build a whole test suite without writing a single line of code. To write or edit a test step, select preset actions like click, fill, scroll, and so on. Then utilize your mouse to take a screenshot of the component you need to apply the action to.
After you’ve successfully built your first set-up of tests, you can start them off whenever you’re prepared with a single click. Or you can also integrate your tests into your CI/CD pipeline through our API, CLI, CircleCI Orb, or GitHub Action tools.
Each test gets recorded and stored on the QA Fiction’s platform, whether it passes or fails as a result. This allows you to compare and understand a passed test run with a failed one which can be useful in figuring out failures in flaky tests. Video replays likewise show you everything paving the way to the failure.
Most of the testing teams discover they need a method for conducting hundred of tests, run various tests at once, and communicate all the more effectively with everybody in the team. QA Fiction is highly equipped with all that you’ll require to run and manage full suite automation and manual tests.
This makes it simple to scale your testing as your organization develops and grows without slowing down the product improvement lifecycle. You only pay for what you use.